BCE asks CRTC to reject Rogers-Shaw deal

0
0
BCE asks CRTC to reject Rogers-Shaw deal


GATINEAU, Qc – BCE on Thursday urged the CRTC to reject the proposed buyout of Shaw Communications by Rogers Communications for $ 26 billion, while independent operators have asked for more guarantees from the regulatory group.





© Provided by The Canadian Press



Speaking on the penultimate day of hearings in Gatineau this week, BCE representatives echoed concerns raised by broadcasters, producers and distributors about the market dominance Rogers would achieve if the ‘deal was approved.

“The market power that Rogers seeks to acquire will have a negative long-term impact that will reverberate throughout this interdependent ecosystem,” warned BCE chief legal and regulatory officer Robert Malcolmson.

“If successful, Rogers will achieve a degree of control over the broadcasting industry to levels never before contemplated, with no clear offsetting benefit to the Canadian broadcasting system.”

Malcolmson referred to the CRTC’s initial rejection of BCE’s acquisition of Astral Media in 2012, due to the size it would have occupied in the market, as a clear precedent to reject, if not at least require commitments from Rogers to divest assets in order to reduce its future market share.

Bell Vice President of Content and Business Intelligence Sarah Farrugia argued that if Rogers were allowed to get 47% of English-language broadcasting subscribers, they would be able to secure the rights exclusive international programs, which it could use to direct subscribers to its online streaming services, to the detriment of the broadcasting system.

“It is very clear that the transaction would allow Rogers to enjoy a dominant position in negotiations for distribution, which in turn would result in reduced revenues for Canadian channels.”

Rogers argued that it needs increased stature to compete with growing competition from companies like Netflix and Amazon, while keeping subscribers within the regulated broadcasting system.

Video: Eric Girard takes stock of Quebec’s economic and financial situation (Le Devoir)

Eric Girard takes stock of Quebec’s economic and financial situation

  • Oil company wins case against Legault government
    Oil company wins case against Legault government
    An oil company wins its case against the Legault government While the Legault government promises to put an end to oil and gas exploration in Quebec, the Court of Quebec has just ruled in favor of a company which contested the refusal of a license to oil drilling in Gaspésie. The company Gaspé Énergies had launched a legal action to contest Quebec’s decision to deny it a drilling permit in 2020 for a project located west of Gaspé. The Utica Resources subsidiary considered that its oil exploration program does not represent a risk for the protection of waterways in this sector. The Court of Quebec has just partially won the case against Gaspé Énergies by ordering the Minister to reassess the case. The court also ruled that the justification for the Minister’s decision was insufficient. Ironically, the government is also a shareholder in this project, into which it has already injected at least $ 10 million in public funds. Even if it tried to part with this participation initiated by Couillard, the Legault government was unable to do so, due to lack of interest from investors. Quebec had announced its intention to put an end to oil and gas projects. The province would then have to manage several compensation requests from companies that still hold exploration permits. This is the case for Utica Resources, which today controls 4,400 km2 in the St. Lawrence Lowlands and in the Gaspé. According to what its president, Mario Lévesque, specified last month in a written response to Le Devoir, the value of the assets amounted to “several billion dollars”.

    Le Devoir logo: Le Devoir smallFavicon
    The duty

  • How do Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines work?
    How do Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines work?
    How do Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines work? Two mRNA vaccines, one from Pfizer-BioNTech and one from Moderna, have been administered to Canadians since the start of the country’s vaccination campaign. Focus on this new technology. The dose consists of fragments of messenger RNA, a molecule that contains instructions for assembling proteins. These fragments are inserted into a pocket of lipid allowing them to slip into cells of the body. Once inside cells, messenger RNA instructs ribosomes, molecular machines that build proteins, so that they themselves produce the famous “little peaks” covering the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. . On their own, these (sharp) components of the coronavirus are harmless and cannot trigger an infection. However, they can serve as “antigens”, that is, agents that trigger an immune response. The body then acquires antibodies that can help it fight a possible infection with the coronavirus. It also trains another squadron of the immune system, T lymphocytes, which can also protect against disease.

    Le Devoir logo: Le Devoir smallFavicon
    The duty

  • The Court refuses the request to suspend the decree imposing the vaccination of caregivers
    The Court refuses the request to suspend the decree imposing the vaccination of caregivers
    The Court refuses the request to suspend the decree imposing the vaccination of caregivers The workers of the health network were not successful in this first round of their battle to invalidate the decree which requires them to be vaccinated against COVID-19. They wanted this obligation to be suspended pending the trial which will empty the question, but Judge Michel Yergeau of the Superior Court told them no on Monday morning. The date on which he rendered judgment is not trivial. The deadline – the second, after a first postponement – was to be November 15. But between the pleadings of the lawyers on the request for suspension and the judgment, Quebec declared that it renounced to apply the decree which imposes the double vaccination. He said he feared service disruptions that would hurt the population, since the penalty for refusing the vaccine was to be suspension without pay. Regardless, the magistrate rendered his decision all the same: despite “this major change of course”, “the exact nature and scope of the modifications to be made to the decree following this announcement are not yet known at the time of sign this judgment ”. Those who brought this request to court refuse to be vaccinated. They invoke their freedom of choice and the inviolability of their person. Several said they agreed to be tested regularly for COVID-19, which was the solution finally adopted by Quebec. After analyzing the positions of the parties, the judge concluded that the applicants had raised “serious” questions and demonstrated “an appearance of right”. However, he recalls that it is not for a judge to reassess whether the contested government decision is wise or not: he can only intervene if it does not respect the laws in force.

    Le Devoir logo: Le Devoir smallFavicon
    The duty

NEXT VIDEO

NEXT VIDEO

Independent actors want guarantees

While Rogers’ direct competitors such as Telus and BCE adamantly opposed the deal during the hearings, companies that depend on Rogers and Shaw to host their programming have expressed more specific comments, with many requests focusing on maintaining the status quo for a certain period.

The Independent Broadcast Group has asked Rogers to commit to maintaining 50 independent channels, compared to the 40 the company said it would maintain for three years.

Ethnic Channels Group has asked the CRTC to require subscription revenues for independent ethnic producers not to decline for five years, and children’s television content producer WildBrain has asked the regulator to force Rogers to continue broadcasting. independent shows currently hosted by Rogers or Shaw for five years. Others have asked that Rogers be required to maintain the satellite broadcast services that Shaw currently provides.

Earlier Thursday, the CEO of the Canadian Media Producers Association, Reynolds Mastin, called for more tangible benefits from the deal, saying the $ 5.7 million in total benefits proposed were not commensurate with the chord size.

“The CRTC should ensure that the applicant commits to providing a tangible benefit package commensurate with the size and nature of the transaction, and which clearly and unequivocally benefits Canadians and their broadcasting system.”

Unifor has raised concerns over Rogers’ plans to take back the $ 13 million a year Shaw gives Global News for an expansion of its own CityNews network, saying the plan risks reducing the diversity of voices. in small markets.

The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) hearings focus on the implications of the agreement for the broadcasting industry. Other issues raised by the transaction, such as those relating to wireless communications services, will be reviewed by the Competition Bureau and by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.

Rogers is due to respond to questions raised during CRTC hearings since the start of the week on Friday.

Companies in this story: (TSX: RCI.B, TSX: SJR.B; TSX: BCE)

The Canadian Press

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here